Part 3. Submission Processing
Chapter 28. Special Processing Procedures
Section 4. Identity Theft Returns for Submission Processing
3.28.4 Identity Theft Returns for Submission Processing
Manual Transmittal
November 14, 2023
Purpose
(1) This transmits revised IRM 3.28.4, Special Processing Procedures - Identity Theft Returns for Submission Processing.
Material Changes
(1) IRM 3.28.4 - Changed Correspondence Imaging System (CIS) to Correspondence Imaging Inventory (CII) throughout this IRM. IPU 23U0210 issued 02-02-2023.
(2) IRM 3.28.4.1.1(3) & (4) Background - Removed references to site consolidation. IPU 23U0210 issued 02-02-2023.
(3) IRM 3.28.4.1.5 - Terms/definitions/Acronyms - Added Acronym for CII. IPU 23U0210 issued 02-02-2023.
(4) IRM 3.28.4.1.5 - Terms/definitions/Acronyms - Added Acronym for RRD and clarified IPSU definition.
(5) IRM 3.28.4.4 – ITAR – Removed ITAR section from IRM.
(6) IRM 3.28.4.4.1(3) - Referral Process - Added link on document request process for unpostables.
(7) IRM 3.28.4.4.2(1) - OFP Codes – Added OFP for working OARS.
(8) IRM 3.28.4.4.3(1)(c) - GUF Command Codes – Removed example.
(9) IRM 3.28.4.4.3(2) – GUF Command Codes – Revised to Refer to GUF IRM only.
(10) IRM 3.28.4.4.4(3) - Research Steps - Added Statute information.
(11) IRM 3.28.4.4.4(6) – Research Steps – Removed information regarding Fraud Refund Scheme listing.
(12) IRM 3.28.4.4.4(11) – Research Steps – Removed MFT 32 resolution.
(13) IRM 3.28.4.4.5(3) – Determination and Closure Instructions – Updated Tax Year and Tax Return years.
(14) IRM 3.28.4.4.5.1(2) – Resolution for MFT 29 Form 5329 – Removed information on IAT tool.
(15) IRM 3.28.4.4.5.2(2) – Non-IDT Related Issues on UPC 147 Returns – Clarified instructions for Form 8749 and added table to clarify TDI and notice delay.
(16) IRM 3.28.4.4.5.3(1) – Duplicate Returns – Clarified NOTE and added Forms and Schedules to list.
(17) IRM 3.28.4.4.7(4) - Sending Documents to Files - Clarified received date information and added Category Code.
(18) IRM 3.28.4.5 – Processable/ Unprocessable Returns – Clarified section.
(19) IRM 3.28.4.5(6) – Processable/ Unprocessable Returns – Change IRM References to match XREF Titles.
(20) IRM 3.28.4.5.1 - Correspondence Return date Requirements - Moved information to 3.28.4.5.
(21) IRM 3.28.4.6.1(2) - MFT 32 Reversals - UPC 147 RC 0 - Updated Tax Period and Added Notes for Statute Imminent or monitoring longer than 12 weeks.
(22) IRM 3.28.4.6.2.1(1)(A) - Steps to Move a Special Processing Code “T” Return from MFT 32 to MFT 30 - Updated Tax year.
(23) IRM 3.28.4.6.3(3)(16) - Procedures for Manually Reprocessing MFT 32 Returns - Added to update AMS with action taken.
(24) IRM 3.28.4.6.4 – Sending a Closing Letter – Moved Closing Letter into Returns on MFT 32 section.
(25) IRM 3.28.4.7.3(1) - Procedures for Manually Reprocessing MFT 32 Returns - Changed tax period from 2019 to 2020. IPU 23U0281 issued 02-17-2023.
(26) Editorial changes have been made throughout this IRM to correct spelling, grammar, plain language, web addresses, and links. IPU 23U0210 issued 02-02-2023.
(27) IRM references listed have been validated and changed throughout this IRM. IPU 23U0210 issued 02-02-2023.
Effect on Other Documents
IRM 3.28.4 (effective January 1, 2024), is superseded. The following IRM Procedural Updates were incorporated into this IRM: IPU 23U0210 issued 02-02-2023 and 23U0281 issued 02-17-2023.
Audience
Individual Master File (IMF) Notice Review Units, Wage and Investment, Submission Processing Centers.
Effective Date
(01-01-2024)
James L. Fish
Director, Submission Processing
Wage and Investment Division
Program Scope and Objectives
(1) Purpose: This IRM contains procedures for working the following types of identity theft related cases:
Potential identity theft returns that unpost as Unpostable Code (UPC) 147 Reason Code (RC) 0. The procedures include research to determine whether the return was filed by the owner of the taxpayer identification number (TIN), or someone else. The Unpostables function refers these cases to the Submission Processing Identity Theft (SP IDT) function for additional research and resolution.
Requests for returns to be moved from MFT 32 to MFT 30 when research determines that the return was filed by an authorized filer. SP IDT examiners only work cases where the return was originally moved to MFT 32 by Submission Processing.
(2) Audience: The primary users of this IRM are Submission Processing employees in the Notice Review function, who work Identity Theft related returns.
(3) Policy Owner: Director, Submission Processing.
(4) Program Owner: Post Processing Section (An organization within Submission Processing, Specialty Branch).
(5) Primary Stakeholders: Other areas that are affected by these procedures include:
Accounts Management
Taxpayer Advocate Service
Return Integrity and Compliance Services
Background
(1) Confirmed Identity Theft victims are provided an Identity Protection PIN (IP PIN) to use when filing their future returns. If a paper return is filed without the required IP PIN, the return unposts UPC 147 RC 0. The unpostable returns are routed and maintained in the Generalized Unpostable Framework (GUF) system. After research, unpostable resolution codes (URC) are input to resolve the unpostable condition.
(2) Situations occur where a return needs to be moved (reversed) from MFT 32 to MFT 30 in order for a refund to be processed. The SP IDT function processes requests for reversal only when the return was originally moved by SP IDT or the ERS/Rejects function input special processing code (SPC) "T".
Authority
(1) Authority for these procedures is found in the following sections of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and their corresponding Treasury regulations:
IRC 6201(a)
IRC 6402(a)
(2) All Policy Statements for Submission Processing are contained in IRM 1.2.1, Servicewide Policies and Authorities, Servicewide Policy Statements.
Responsibilities
(1) The Director of Submission Processing is responsible for policy related to this IRM.
(2) The Submission Processing Input Corrections Operations Manager is responsible for monitoring operational performance for their operation.
(3) The Manager/Team Lead is responsible for performance monitoring and ensuring employees have the tools to perform their duties.
(4) The tax examiners are responsible for following the instructions contained in this IRM and maintain updated IRM procedures.
Program Management and Review
(1) Program Goals: Review unpostable returns and ensure that the valid returns are posted to the taxpayer’s account and the fraudulent returns are posted to MFT 32.
(2) Program Reports: Generalized Unpostable Framework (GUF) reports are used for inventory management, work assignment and follow-up. These reports are stored on the Control-D system. Information about specific reports is found in IRM 3.12.32.20, GUF Listings and Reports - General Information and Distribution.
(3) Program Effectiveness: The examiners’ case work is subject to Quality Review conducted using the Embedded Quality for Submission Processing (EQSP) System and Measured Employee Performance System (MEPS).
(4) Annual Review: Annually review the processes outlined in this IRM to ensure accuracy and promote consistent tax administration.
Terms/Definitions/Acronyms
(1) The table lists commonly used acronyms.Acronyms
Acronym | Definition |
---|---|
AMS | Accounts Management Services |
CC | Command Code |
CCC | Computer Condition Code |
CII | Correspondence Imaging Inventory |
CSR | Customer Service Representative |
DLN | Document Locator Number |
EITC | Earned Income Tax Credit |
EFTPS | Electronic Federal Tax Payment System |
EUP | Employee User Portal |
GUF | Generalized Unpostable Framework |
IDRS | Integrated Data Retrieval System |
IDTVA | Identity Theft Victim Assistance |
IP PIN | Identity Protection Personal Identification Number |
IPSU | Identity Protection Specialized Unit (inventory process reference only, does not define teams/units) |
IRM | Internal Revenue Manual |
IRPTR | Information Returns Transcript File on Line |
IRS | Internal Revenue Service |
IRSN | Internal Revenue Service Number |
ITAR | Identity Theft Assistance Request |
LKA | Last Known Address |
MFT | Master File Tax (Code) |
NTA | National Taxpayer Advocate |
OAR | Operations Assistance Request |
OFP | Organization, Function and Program |
RIVO | Return Integrity and Verification Operations |
RPD | Return Processable Date |
RRD | Return Received Date |
RTR | Remittance Transaction Research System |
SSN | Social Security Number |
SPC | Special Processing Code |
SP IDT | Submission Processing Identity Theft |
TAC | Taxpayer Assistance Center |
TAS | Taxpayer Advocate Service |
TBOR | Taxpayer Bill of Rights |
TC | Transaction Code |
TIN | Taxpayer Identification Number |
TPP | Taxpayer Protection Program |
UPC | Unpostable Code |
URC | Unpostable Resolution Code |
URF | Unidentified Remittance File |
XSF | Excess Collection File |
Related Resources
(1) The following websites and electronic tools are used to resolve the UPC 147 cases:
Integrated Automation Technologies (IAT)
Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS)
Servicewide Electronic Research Program (SERP)
Accounts Management Services (AMS)
(2) The IRS adopted the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR) in June 2014. Employees are responsible for being familiar with and acting in accordance with taxpayer rights. See IRC 7803(a)(3), Execution of Duties in Accord with Taxpayer Rights. For additional information about the TBOR, see Pub 5170, Taxpayer Bill of Rights and TBOR link https://irssource.web.irs.gov/Lists/General%20News/DispItemForm.aspx?ID=126.
Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) Deviations
(1) Service center directors, headquarter branch chiefs, and headquarter analysts do not have the authority to approve deviations from IRM procedures. Any request for an exception to, or deviation from, an IRM procedure must be elevated through appropriate channels for executive approval. This ensures other functional areas are not adversely affected by the change, and that it does not result in disparate treatment of taxpayers.
(2) See specific guidelines in IRM 1.11.2, Internal Management Documents System, Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) Process. Submit IRM deviation requests in writing, following instructions in IRM 1.11.2.2.4, When Procedures Deviate from the IRM.
(3) The Field Director must sign the request, submit the request through headquarters IRM Coordinator for executive level program owner review and approval. Deviations may begin after the request is approved.
IDRS Access
(1) While working assigned cases, SP employees may come across some accounts that are blocked on IDRS. These accounts can be identified by an IDRS security violation message: "Unauthorized Access to This Account". When employees attempt to access a blocked case using the Corresponding Imaging Inventory (CII) the error message , "You are not authorized to access this case" will display. Forward the case (e.g., UPTIN screens, correspondence, etc.) to your manager to elevate to Planning & Analysis (P&A) staff. P&A scans the encrypted case to the "≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡" mailbox to request access to the account. Managers retain the original case in a file awaiting access (can take up to five business days). Once notified access has been granted, the case can be processed following applicable procedures.
Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS)
(1) This subsection contains information on referring cases to TAS.
TAS Background Information
(1) The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS whose employees assist taxpayers whose problems with the IRS are causing financial difficulties for the taxpayer, their family, or their business; who have tried but haven’t been able to resolve their problems with the IRS; and those who believe an IRS system or procedure isn’t working as it should.
(2) Taxpayers have the right to a fair and just tax system, which includes the right to assistance from the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) if they are experiencing financial difficulty or if the IRS has not resolved their tax issues properly and timely through its normal channels. Information on TAS case acceptance criteria and how and when to refer a taxpayer to TAS is available in IRM 13.1.7, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Case Criteria. TAS criteria includes economic burden, systemic burden, best interest of the taxpayer, and public policy (as determined solely by the National Taxpayer Advocate (NTA).
(3) Employees should not view TAS case criteria as a means of excluding taxpayers from TAS, but rather, as a guide to TAS case acceptance. The criteria under which TAS accepts a case should not govern whether a taxpayer is entitled to relief.
Referring Cases to TAS
(1) Refer taxpayers to the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) when the contact meets TAS criteria, see IRM 13.1.7, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Case Criteria, and you can’t resolve the taxpayer’s issue the same day. The definition of "same day" is within 24 hours. "Same day" cases include cases you can completely resolve in 24 hours, as well as cases in which you have taken steps within 24 hours to begin resolving the taxpayer's issue. The taxpayer should be advised that TAS is available if the taxpayer is not satisfied with the service he or she received. Provide the taxpayer with the number for the NTA toll-free case intake line, 1-877-777-4778 or TTY/TDD 1-800-829-4059. Do not refer these cases to TAS unless they meet TAS criteria and the taxpayer asks to be transferred to TAS. Refer to IRM 13.1.7.5, Same-Day Resolution by Operations.
(2) An IRS employee should make a referral to a TAS office if the employee receives a taxpayer contact and cannot initiate action to resolve the inquiry or provide the relief requested. A taxpayer does not have to specifically request TAS assistance to be referred to TAS. When appropriate, IRS employees advise taxpayers of the option to seek TAS assistance. It is important that all IRS employees handle potential TAS cases with the taxpayer's best interest in mind. Refer also to IRM 21.1.3.18, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Guidelines, for more information.
(3) When referring cases to TAS, use Form 911, Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance (and Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order), and forward it to TAS in accordance with your local procedures. Check the TAS box on AMS, if applicable.
(4) Do not refer the following types of cases to TAS:
Cases where the taxpayer’s complaint or inquiry only questions the constitutionality of the tax system; or
Cases where the focus of the taxpayer's inquiry is solely to employ frivolous tax strategies to avoid or delay filing or paying federal taxes
Note: TAS Case criteria is defined in IRM 13.1.7.2, Introduction to TAS Case Criteria.
Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Operations Assistance Request (OAR)
(1) A Form 12412, Operations Assistance Request (OAR), is used by TAS to request assistance on a TAS case when TAS does not have the authority to take the required action. Unless otherwise noted by manager, OAR cases take precedence over other SP IDT cases.
(2) Route SP IDT OAR referrals to SP Input Correction Notice Review (ICN) E-OAR Mailbox at each site. "147" case will be documented in the subject line of the E-mail by TAS. OARs received through the ICN E-OAR Mailbox are distributed to the appropriate employee and worked as a priority.
(3) Make every effort to expedite completion of OAR cases. Completion time frames are indicated on Form 12412 in Section V (box 1b and 2c). Send any issued taxpayer correspondence to the case assigned TAS employee while TAS has an open control.
Note: The OAR may request delegated authority for TAS to issue a manual refund; see IRM 3.28.4.6.5, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Request for Manual Refund.
(4) When TAS has requested expedited processing, the Operating Division or Functional Liaison acknowledges receipt via Form 3210,Document Transmittal, secure messaging E-mail, facsimile, or by telephone within one (1) workday of receipt of the OAR. When TAS does not require expedited processing, the Operating Division or Functional Liaison acknowledges receipt via Form 3210, secure messaging E-mail, facsimile, or by Telephone within three (3) workdays of receipt of the OAR.
(5) Contact the TAS employee assigned within one (1) workday when:
Determining additional research or documentation is required on OAR
To obtain and re-negotiate the requested completion date on expedited processing of an OAR
Note: Follow procedures outlined in the Service Level Agreement when the TAS employee does not provide the information within the time frame provided.
(6) Immediately notify management when resolution of a taxpayer's case cannot be completed by the requested time frame or by a negotiated extension date. Work with the Taxpayer Advocate contact listed on Form 12412 to arrive at agreed upon time frames for follow-up based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
(7) Discuss the findings and recommendations on the final disposition of the case with the appropriate TAS contact. The TAS contact is responsible for communicating the final decision on the case to the taxpayer however this does not prohibit the manager/employee from also communicating that decision to the taxpayer.
(8) Elevate cases to Management when staff cannot agree upon the resolution to the account..
(9) Resolve the case, and complete the following information on Form 12412:
Section V - Boxes 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10
Section VI - Lines 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 2c
Note: Box 4 is also required if case meets TAS criteria 1-4. Enter the date Operating Division/Functional Unit decided whether to comply or not with TAS relief/assistance request.
Note: Lines 2a, 2b, and 2c are completed only if rejecting.
Unpostable Code (UPC) 147 Reason Code (RC) 0
(1) The unpostable condition, UPC 147 RC 0, occurs when a return does not contain a matching Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (IP PIN), when an IP PIN is present in the entity. See IRM 3.12.179.46, UPC 147 RC 0 - Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (IP PIN).
(2) UPC 147 RC 0 cases that unpost are automatically routed to the Unpostable function for preliminary research and resolution.
(3) The Unpostable function will refer and reassign the unpostable to the SP IDT function, when unable to determine whether the return was submitted by the Social Security Number (SSN) owner or by an unauthorized filer.
Referral Process
(1) Each case referred by Unpostables may contain a UPC 147 RC 0 Comparison Checklist,≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(2) For paper returns, Unpostables forwards the entire return with any attachments, the Form 4251, Return Charge-Out, and the checklist to SP IDT.
Note: Unpostables initiates one request to Files for the document prior to referring a case to SP IDT. If the documents are not received from Files on the first request, then Unpostables will send the SP IDT function just the charge-out with a notation that documents were not received.
(3) For unpostable 147 RC 0 cases received without a return, SP IDT will review the unpostable without the return. SP IDT will determine and initiate any document requests in order to resolve the unpostable condition. Refer to IRM 3.12.179.8.
Note: The unpostable return must be secured before closing with URC 8. See IRM 3.12.179.8.1.2..
(4) Do not detach any identity theft substantiation documentation received with UPC 147 RC 0. Review the documentation to make a determination of the true owner of the social security number. Substantiation documentation includes Form 14039, Identity Theft Affidavit, police reports, copies of identification cards, etc.
Note: Often the documentation received with an UPC 147 RC 0 case is a duplicate of documentation previously submitted by the taxpayer.
Organization, Function, and Program (OFP) Codes for UPC 147 RC 0 Work
(1) Use the following OFP when working UPC 147 RC 0 cases:
290 -40012 for research, review and resolution of open UPC 147 RC 0 cases
550-40012 for clerical activities related to open 147 RC 0 cases
710-40000 for referrals on closed UPC 147 RC 0 cases (e.g., MFT 32 reversals)
290-36720 for working OARS.
Generalized Unpostable Framework (GUF) Command Codes
(1) The following command codes (CCs) are used for closing unpostable cases.
Use CC UPTIN to display all open unpostable cases for a specific taxpayer identification number (TIN). CC UPTIN is used to get the cycle sequence number for a case.
Use CC UPDIS to display unpostable records. When CC UPDIS is input with cycle sequence number, the response screen display shown will be CC UPRES.
Use CC UPRES to close the unpostable case. CC UPRES is displayed when CC UPDIS is input.
Use CC UPCASZ to enter remarks. Overlay CC UPRES with CC UPCAS using Definer “Z”.
(2) For more information on the General Unpostables refer to IRM 3.12.32.
Research Steps
(1) Make the determination of whether the unpostable return was filed by the owner of the SSN or not. ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(2) Research using CC ENMOD, IMFOL, TRDBV, DDBKD, RTVUE, NAMES, INOLE, DUPOL, FFINQ, REINF, IRPTR, etc., as applicable. See the IDRS Command Code Job Aid for more information on each Command Code.
(3) Research for Statute Criteria. IRM 25.6, Statute of Limitations, provides guidelines for the clearing and processing of Statute-imminent cases. Different methods are used to determine the Assessment (ASED), Refund (RSED), or Collection (CSED) Statute expiration dates. The Unpostable functions should familiarize themselves with the information that relates to an Unpostable condition. However, the Unpostables function must clear all statute-imminent cases other than Transaction Code (TC) 291/TC 301 decreases through the Statute function. Decreases should be forwarded to the Accounts Management Correspondence section whether the statute is imminent or expired.
Note: Refer to IRM 25.6.1.6.5, Chart of Expedited Statute Processing, for statute expiration dates.
(4) Compare data from the return and attachments to prior years posted return history to determine if the return was submitted by the SSN owner. ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
Caution: ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(5) Review the account and the returns to determine what information matches the previous year's identity theft return and what matches the return filed by the SSN owner.
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
Note: ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(6) Check CC IRPTR (if available) to verify if the information on the return matches IRP documents. Take the following into consideration:
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(7) ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(8) ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
Caution: ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(9) ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(10) All the information gathered through the above research should be weighed, to determine whether the return was filed by the SSN owner or not. Follow the procedures in IRM 3.28.4.4.5, Determination and Closure Instructions, to close the unpostable according to the determination.
(11) MFT 32 has been established to contain tax returns that have been identified as identity theft or possible identity theft. Input TC 971 AC 111 on MFT 30 with the document locator number (DLN) of the identity theft or possible identity theft return in the MISC field to move to MFT 32. Only TC 976 posts to MFT 32. A return moved to MFT 32 can be viewed using CC TRDBV..
Determination and Closure Instructions
(1) A control base is input when the taxpayer goes through the Taxpayer Protection Program (TPP) authentication process. Review the unpostable module for a control base (open or closed) to determine the appropriate resolution action.
If IDRS number "1487333333", in "M" status, with activity code "NONIDT" and category code "MISC", is present follow IRM 3.28.4.4.5 Determination and Closure Instructions.
If IDRS number "1487311111", in "M" status, with activity code "IDT" and category code "MISC" is present follow IRM 3.28.4.4.5 Determination and Closure Instructions.
(2) Follow the steps below when it is determined that the return was filed by the true SSN owner to close the unpostable.
If... | And... | Then... |
---|---|---|
A. Research per IRM 3.28.4.4.4, Research Steps, supports the return was filed by the SSN owner | The return contains one of the following issues:
| Follow resolution procedures in IRM 3.28.4.4.5.2, Non- Identity Theft Related Issues on UPC 147 Returns. |
B. Research per IRM 3.28.4.4.4, Research Steps, supports the return was filed by the SSN owner | The return is a duplicate of a posted return on the valid or invalid side of MFT 30 or posted to MFT 32. Note: Contact the Entity Unit to merge a module when the valid taxpayer has a posted return on the invalid side for the same tax period as the unpostable tax period. Once the merge to the valid side is complete, continue to follow the procedures in this section. For more information on validity or merges, see IRM 3.13.5.12, Valid and Invalid Segment of the Individual Master File (IMF). | Follow resolution procedures in IRM 3.28.4.4.5.3, Duplicate Returns. |
C. Research per IRM 3.28.4.4.4, Research Steps, supports the return was filed by the SSN owner | No other issues were identified | Close with URC 0 Input remarks “SPIDT- Good.” |
(3) Follow the steps in the table below to close the unpostable when it is determined the return was not filed by the actual SSN owner.
Note: If a mixed entity condition is identified, input a note in Accounts Management System.
If ... | And ... | Then ... |
---|---|---|
A. Research per IRM 3.28.4.4.4, Research Steps, supports the return was not filed by the SSN owner | This was determined because research doesn’t support income claimed. Example: Information on IRPTR doesn’t match or IRPTR is not available. | If the tax return is for TY 2021 or later, move the return to MFT 32:
If tax year is 2020 or earlier:
|
B. Research per IRM 3.28.4.4.4, Research Steps doesn't support the return was filed by the SSN owner | This was determined because research doesn’t support income claimed. Example: Information on IRPTR does match with possible employment related identity theft fraud or additional income generated by a person other than the valid SSN owner. |
|
Resolution for MFT 29 Form 5329
(1) A return that meets the criteria for UPC 147 RC 0 may also have an associated Form 5329, Additional Tax on Qualified Plans, on MFT 29. If the MFT 29 form unposts as UPC 147 RC 0, close the unpostable with the same resolution as the associated MFT 30 return using the instructions in paragraph 2.
(2) ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
---|---|---|
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
| ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
Non-Identity Theft Related Issues on UPC 147 Returns
(1) The determination may be that the return was filed by the SSN owner, but one of the following issues is present:
Return was processed for the wrong tax period
Multiple years of income on one tax year
An Internal Revenue Service Number (IRSN) was processed to a SSN
Excessive withholding that is not supported by Forms W-2, 1099, 1042-S or other valid supporting documents per CC IRPTR research. ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(2) Closure steps:
The unpostable return should be secured or verified
Close the unpostable to Rejects with URC 8 with Null 01
Follow procedures in IRM 3.12.179.6.1 to complete Form 8749. Notate in box 15 the reason, as defined in paragraph 1, and also notate "Input SPC "B"
Send the return to Rejects with Form 8749 , Unpostable Action and Routing Slip
Determine if TDI or notice delay is needed
If... | Then... |
---|---|
MF or SC Status 02,03 | Input 599-18. |
MF or SC Status 20, 21, 56 or 58 | Input CC STAUPS with definer S. |
MF or SC Status 22, 53, 60 or 72 | Input TC 470. |
Any other MF or SC Status or Blank | No need for TDI or Notice delay. |
Input TDI and notice delay. See IRM 3.12.179.14.2, Inputting Command Code STAUP or TC 470.
Duplicate Returns
(1) When researching a UPC 147 RC 0 unpostable, you may identify a return that appears to be a duplicate of a return posted to MFT 30. If the unpostable return is determined to have been filed by the SSN owner, then check whether the return matches all of the following items on the posted return and can be considered to be a "true" duplicate.
Note: These procedures do not apply if the original, duplicate or both returns contain a math error.
Name Control
Spousal Social Security Number (S-SSN)
Address
Filing Status Code (FSC) Compare the input with the controlling name line
Number of exemptions
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)
Taxable Income
Tax
Balance Due/Refund
Credit Elect, if present. Compare input with the sum of the unapplied credit elect amount PLUS the TC 83X amount
Direct Deposit Information
Transcribed Forms and Schedules
(2) Use the table to process the duplicate return when a return is posted to MFT 30.
If... | And... | Then... |
---|---|---|
A. Unpostable return is a "true" duplicate | the Julian date and last digit (processing year) of the DLN is earlier than the posted return’s Julian date | Treat as an original and continue to follow instructions in IRM 3.28.4.4.5, Determination and Closure Instructions for posting the return. |
B. Unpostable return is a "true "duplicate | the Julian date and last digit (processing year) of the DLN is later than the posted return’s Julian date |
|
C. Unpostable return is not a "true" duplicate |
| Continue to follow instructions in IRM 3.28.4.4.5(2), Determination and Closure Instructions for posting the return. |
(3) Use the table below to process the duplicate return when a return is already posted to MFT 32.
If... | And... | Then... |
---|---|---|
A. Unpostable return is a "true" duplicate | the Julian date and last digit (processing year) of the DLN is earlier than the MFT 32 posted return’s Julian date | Treat as an original and continue to follow instructions in IRM 3.28.4.4.5, Determination and Closure Instructions for posting the return. |
B. Unpostable return is a "true "duplicate | the Julian date and last digit (processing year) of the DLN is later than the MFT 32 posted return’s Julian date |
|
C. Unpostable return is not a "true" duplicate | Return posted to MFT 32 is determined to have been filed by the SSN owner. |
. |
Inputting Identity Theft Indicators
(1) Input TC 971 AC 506 when the UPC 147 resolution resulted in determination of identity theft. For more information, see IRM 25.23.2-8, IMF Only TC 971 AC 506 – IRS Determined Tax-Related Identity Theft Case Closure.
(2) Prior to marking the taxpayer's account with a TC 971 AC 506 the function MUST ensure all corrective actions have been taken. Use the following If and Then chart to take the appropriate corrective action.
Note: ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
---|---|---|
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
|
|
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
|
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
|
|
(3)
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
---|
Example 1: |
AA 1040 2020 2021-07-06 N/C P PAPER MF UNPOSTABLE |
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
AC 1040 2020 2021-05-16 N/C P MEFILE MEF REJECTED |
|
Example : |
AA 1040 2018 2021-06-01 N/C P PAPER MF POSTED |
AB 1040 2020 2021-03-30 N/C P MEFILE MF UNPOSTABLE |
(4)
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
---|
AA 1040 2018 2020-07-09 N/C P PAPER MF UNPOSTABLE |
AB 1040 2020 2021-05-19 N/C P MEFILE MEF REJECTED |
Sending Documents to Files
(1) Send various documents received to Files, including responses to correspondence and duplicate returns.
(2) Use the documents to determine the identity of the return filer. Once the case is resolved, attach the documents to the return and send to Files.
(3) If the return was e-filed, follow the instructions in paragraph four below for sending the documents to Files.
Exception: If the return was moved to MFT 32≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡, then do not input a TC 290 to generate a non-file document locator number (DLN). Send the correspondence to the Alpha Files using Form 3210, Document Transmittal. In the 'Remarks' section, notate: “Identity Theft returns(s)/forms or correspondence, store in the Alpha Files”. See IRM 3.5.61.21.10, Identity Theft Returns - Alpha Files.
(4) Use the IAT tool, REQ54 Tool-Adjustment Calculator to input the TC 290 on IDRS. This generates a non-refile DLN and creates Form 12249, Adjustment Document, to attach to the documents. Use the following information to complete fields on the tool.
Blocking Series (BLK) as "05"
Category Code “”MISC”.
IRS Received Date (IRS-RCVD-DT) as stamped on the document. Use due date of return if no date stamp.
Transaction Code (TC) as "290"
Transaction amount (AMT) as "00"
Hold-CD as "3"
SOURCE-DOCUMENT-ATTACHED as "Y"
REMARKS as "Attachment only"
(5) Prepare a routing form and send the documents with the Form 12249 to Files within 5 days of input. Monitor the TC 290 until posted.
Review of Closed UPC 147 RC 0 cases with -R Freezes
(1) Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Operations Assistance Requests (OARs) may be received on closed UPC 147 RC 0 cases that have a -R freeze input by the SP IDT function (return was not moved to MFT 32).
(2) Review the return and account information again. Re-check CC IRPTR to see if any wages, withholding(s), Form 1099s, Form 1042-S, etc., has been added since the case was closed. Use the new information in making a determination.
(3)
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
---|---|---|
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
| ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
Note: ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
Processable / Unprocessable Returns
(1) Master File has the capability to maintain and display two dates. The first date is the Return Received Date (RCVD DATE) and the second date is the "Return Processable Date" (RPD). The RCVD DATE is used to determine statute dates and the RPD is used to compute interest on overpayments.
Note: Caution should be taken to determine when a return was filed or became processable since interest will be allowed from only one of the dates.
(2) Thoroughly research the available documentation and IDRS because a change to the received date may generate a notice to the taxpayer.
(3) Determine the received date in the following priority:
IRS received date stamp
U.S. Postal Service, Army Post Office (APO)
U.S. Embassy or Consulate postmark date, or official postmark of a foreign country
Private Meter postmark
Service Center Automated Mail Processing System (SCAMPS) digital dates
Revenue officer signature date
Signature Date (Current Year Returns)
Julian Date minus 10 days in the DLN
Caution: ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
(4) For further information, refer to IRM 3.10.72.6, IRS Received Dates; IRM 3.30.123.6, Processing Timeliness Criteria for IMF; and/or Document 6209.
(5) If a processed return is timely filed, and the Julian Date is 155 or later, enter the return due date as the Return Received Date (RRD).
(6) If a late reply (correspondence was received after the return due date) was received, include the Return Processable Date (RPD) when reprocessing a return.
Returns on MFT 32
(1) SP IDT will process reversal requests received only if return was originally moved to MFT 32 by SP IDT or the ERS/Rejects function input special processing code (SPC) "T".
Note: SPC "T" displays on the CC TRDBV “CODES” screen as Identity Theft Code "T."
MFT 32 Reversals - UPC 147 RC 0
(1) For cases where the return originally unposted as UPC 147 RC 0 on MFT 30, research to verify whether the return was filed by the social security number (SSN) owner or not. Review any information included with the referral or OAR and check AMS or CII for relevant notes and documents.
(2) Take the following actions to move the return to MFT 30:
Steps for Inputting TC 971 AC 111 |
---|
A. Input TC 971 AC 111 on MFT 32, including the document locator number (DLN) of the return to be moved to MFT 30 and the notice suppression. See IRM 25.25.6-8, Command Code (CC) FRM77 TC 971 AC 111 Input Screen. Note: Do not input TC 971 AC 111 to move a tax year 2021 and earlier return. Manually reprocess the return to MFT 30 following the procedures at IRM 3.28.4.6.3, Procedures for Manually Reprocessing MFT 32 Returns. As of cycle 47 of the processing year, tax year 2022 returns must also be manually reprocessed to MFT 30. Note: If the TC 971 AC 111 input on MFT 32 unposts and cannot be corrected, then reprocess the return manually. See procedures at IRM 3.28.4.6.3, Procedures for Manually Reprocessing MFT 32 Returns. |
B. Monitor the account for the return to post. Open an SP IDT control base using activity MFT32REV, status M, and category code MISC.. |
C. Reverse any TC 971 AC 506 that was input when the return was moved to MFT 32. Note: The date of the TC 972 AC 506 must match the original transaction date. See IRM 25.23.2-9, IMF Only TC 972 AC 506 Tax-Related, Reversal of Identity Theft Case Closure, IRS Identified. |
D. Update AMS notes with action taken.. |
Note: If the cases is Statute Imminent follow walk through process.
Note: If more than 12 weeks have passed and the TC 150 has not posted to MFT 30 elevate to P&A to elevate to HQ.
(3) If the return unposts on MFT 30 take the following steps:
If... | Then... |
---|---|
A. The return unposts as UPC 147 RC 0 |
|
B. The return unposts UPC 126 RC 0 |
Note: Close any OAR with the response that the case should be referred to RIVO for further action. |
(4) Take the following action once the return has posted to MFT 30.
Note: UPC 126 RC 1 generates for returns moved from MFT 32 to MFT 30. GUF systemically closes UPC 126 RC 1 with URC 0 to post on MFT 30.
If... | Then... |
---|---|
A.
EXCEPTION: When the account contains both a TC 971 AC 052 "RRPIDT" marker and a TC 971 AC 052 "RRPNONIDT" marker, utilize the DLN of the TC 971 AC 052 "RRPIDT" to determine which return is being reviewed by RIVO for income verification. |
|
B. TXMOD does not contain a TC 971 AC 052 or contains a TC 971 AC 052 with an entry in the MISC field other than "RRPNONIDT". |
|
MFT 32 Reversals - Special Processing Code (SPC)"T"
(1) ERS/Rejects moves the current year returns to MFT 32 with SPC" T" when a filer does not reply timely to correspondence or the taxpayer responds that the return does not belong to them when corresponded for Error Code (EC) 029. SPIDT may receive requests to reverse the MFT 32 when the taxpayer responds saying that the return was actually filed by them. Operations Assistance Requests (OARs) or Form 4442, Inquiry Referrals, may also be submitted to SP IDT for a return moved to MFT 32 with SPC "T".
Note: Ensure the unclaimed credits are addressed properly. For more information on unclaimed credit see IRM 3.12.3.5.9, Error Code 029 (CE) Unclaimed Credits.
(2) Review the documentation provided for information that verifies that the return was filed by the taxpayer. If estimated payments were not reported, verify whether the taxpayer made the payments or whether the payments were applied to the correct tax period or account. Research using RTR, IMFOL, IRPTR, etc. See IRM 3.12.3.5.9.4, Reply to Correspondence (EC 029) for more information on reviewing the reply to correspondence. If you determine that the payment does not belong to the taxpayer, but you can determine where the payment should be posted, transfer the misapplied credit to the correct account.
(3) If you cannot determine the correct payer, transfer the payment to the Unidentified Remittance File (URF) or the Excess Collection File (XSF). Use Form 2424, Account Adjustment Voucher to send a payment less than twelve months old to URF. See IRM 3.17.10.3.2, Receiving Unidentified Remittance Cases for instructions on filing out Form 2424, Account Adjustment Voucher. UseForm 8758, Excess Collections File Addition to send a payment older than twelve months to XSF. SeeIRM 3.17.220.2.2.1, Preparation of Form 8758 for instructions on preparing Form 8758.
Note: If the payment was made through the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS), fax a request to the EFTPS unit in Ogden Accounting for information that would identify who made the payment. Send the fax to 855-295-0850 and attach a TXMODA screen showing the EFTPS payment. If the EFTPS payer name matches the taxpayer name, allow the payment to remain on the module. If the payment contact information does not match, send the payment to URF or XSF as applicable.
Steps to Move a Special Processing Code "T" Return from MFT 32 to MFT 30
(1) Take the following actions to move the return back to MFT 30:
Steps to move a SPC T return from MFT 32 to MFT 30 |
---|
A. Input TC 971 AC 111 on MFT 32, including the document locator number (DLN) of the return to be moved to MFT 30 and the notice suppression. See IRM 25.25.6-8, Command Code (CC) FRM77 TC 971 AC 111 Input Screen. Note: Do not input TC 971 AC 111 to move a tax year 2020 and prior return. Manually reprocess the return to MFT 30 following the procedures at IRM 3.28.4.6.3, Procedures for Manually Reprocessing MFT 32 Returns. Note: If the TC 971 AC 111 input on MFT 32 unposts and cannot be corrected, then reprocess the return manually. See procedures at IRM 3.28.4.6.3, Procedures for Manually Reprocessing MFT 32 Returns. |
B. Monitor the account for the return to post. Open an SP IDT control base using activity "MFT32REV", status "M", and category code "MISC". |
C. Reverse any TC 971 AC 506 that was input when the return was moved to MFT 32. Note: The date of the TC 972 AC 506 must match the original transaction date. See IRM 25.23.2-9, IMF Only TC 972 AC 506 Tax-Related, Reversal of Identity Theft Case Closure, IRS Identified. |
D. Update AMS notes with action taken. |
(2) Take the following steps once the return has posted on MFT 30. The return may directly post to MFT 30 or unpost UPC 126 RC 1 and automatically close with URC 0.
If... | And... | Then... |
---|---|---|
A.
Exception: When the account contains both a TC 971 AC 052 "RRPIDT" marker and a TC 971 AC 052 "RRPNONIDT" marker, utilize the DLN of the TC 971 AC 052 "RRPNONIDT" "RRPIDT" to determine which return is being reviewed by RIVO for income verification. |
|
|
B. TXMOD does not contain a TC 971 AC 052 or contains a TC 971 AC 052 with an entry in the MISC field other than RRPNONIDT. | taxpayer attaches a 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, to the reply, | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
C. TXMOD does not contain a TC 971 AC 052 or contains a TC 971 AC 052 with an entry in the MISC field other than RRPNONIDT. | taxpayer attaches documentation for additional credits, deductions, or other changes to total tax, balance due, or refund with the reply, | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
D. TXMOD does not contain a TC 971 AC 052 or contains a TC 971 AC 052 with an entry in the MISC field other than "RRPNONIDT". | No changes to the Tax Return or no changes with the reply, | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ Note: ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
E. Form 4442 received | Letter 109C was issued | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
(3) Close the SP IDT control base.
Procedures for Manually Reprocessing MFT 32 Returns
(1) There are times when a return cannot be systemically moved from MFT 32 to MFT 30: Manually reprocess the return in the following circumstances:
TC 971 AC 111 continues to unpost
The return is for tax period 2020 or earlier
(2) Obtain a paper version of the return for reprocessing.
If... | Then... |
---|---|
A. MeF return | Request print using Employee User Portal (EUP) Note: If it appears to be a Reply to MEF Correspondence, request for a paper-copy |
B. Paper return | Request from Files. If return is not available on first request, telephone taxpayer or send Letter 418C requesting copy of return and attachments. Note: Check whether return is available on Correspondence Imaging System. |
(3) Prepare the return for processing as follows:
Do not send Form 1040A, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return or Form 1040-EZ, Income Tax Return for Single and Joint Filers With No Dependents through processing. Convert forms using Form 6114, Prior Year and Conversion Form 1040 Edit Sheet. Staple Form 6114 beneath the PECF areas of the Form 1040A or Form 1040EZ. For more information on conversions, refer to IRM 3.11.3-19, Conversion of TY 2017 - TY 2014 Forms 1040, 1040A, and 1040EZ, Using 2021 Form 6114 and Schedules.
Use red ink to edit the return.
Identify any posted ES payments not claimed on the return. Determine if the ES payments belong to the return filer.
If it is determined the ES payments are misapplied, initiate a credit transfer to post to the correct account/module.
If it is determined the ES payments belong to the return filer, edit missing estimated payments on the appropriate line(s) of the return. For TY 2020 returns, Schedule 3, Part II line 9. Form 2019 returns, Schedule 3 line 8.
Edit special processing code "SPC B" on the return and edit out SPC “T”, if present.
Line through the document locator number (DLN) if present.
Edit "SP IDT" in the upper left-hand corner of the return. Do not write "copy" on the return and circle out "copy" or "duplicate" if present.
Write - "Do Not Correspond For Signature" at the bottom of the return.
Determine the received date using IRM 3.28.4.5, Processable / Unprocessable Returns.
When the RPD is required, edit the RPD using Form 3471,in Edit Sheet, MMDDYY format. Staple Form 3471 to the left side margin of page 1.
Note: If original return was unprocessable because of missing information, use the reply date from letter 12C, 4087C, 2894C/SP or OAR/referral date for the RPD.
Include with the return, all documentation and correspondence replies used to verify the missing information and determine the return processable date.
Route to Batching for expedited processing.
Monitor the return to post. Open an SP IDT control base using activity "MFT32REV", status "M", and category code "MISC".
Reverse any TC 971 AC 506 that was input when the return was moved to MFT 32.
Note: The date of the TC 972 AC 506 must match the original transaction date. See IRM 25.23.2-9, IMF Only TC 972 AC 506 Tax-Related, Reversal of Identity Theft Case Closure, IRS Identified.
Update AMS history of action taken.
Sending a Closing Letter
(1) If determined that the return was not filed by the SSN owner a closing letter must be sent to inform the taxpayer of the actions taken on the account. Update CC ENMOD as needed, to the confirmed good address and send Letter 4310C, IRS ID Theft Post-Adjustment Letter. See IRM 25.23.2.3.7, When to Update the Victim’s Address, for more information. If a confirmed good address cannot be located, update the address to the Service Center address and do not send Letter 4310C. See IRM 3.13.5.66(2), Campus Address Used Only When Taxpayer Address is Unavailable, for the appropriate campus address format.
Note: Do not send Letter 4310C to a deceased taxpayer. Send the letter to the deceased taxpayer’s personal representative on the account or a surviving spouse.
Caution: Do not send Letter 4310C if any of the following indicators are on the account: TC 971 AC 505 IR20150521512, TC 971 AC 505 IR20150521555 or TC 971 AC 505 IR20150521556. These indicators mean that the taxpayer’s TIN was part of the “Get Transcript” breach. Letter 4310C cannot be used because it contains links to the on-line applications which these taxpayers are blocked from using. Use Letter 4674C, Identity Theft Post Adjustment Victim Notification Letter, instead, to apprise the taxpayer of actions taken and include the following paragraphs:
Paragraphs for Letter 4674C |
---|
B |
M (Fill-in: "You may be a victim of identity theft. We adjusted your tax account to show the correct return information or removed the incorrect return from your account. If you have not filed your tax return for the current tax year, you must file a paper return by mail to the Internal Revenue Service address that services your state.") |
8 |
9 |
d |
x |
! (fill-in: If you have questions about this letter, contact the IRS for Specialized assistance at 800-908-4490, Monday - Friday, 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. your local time (Alaska & Hawaii follow Pacific Time)) |
(2) If the letter is returned as undeliverable, research to see if there was a typographical error or omission in the address or whether the letter was sent to appropriate address. If the address can be corrected, resend the letter, otherwise destroy as classified waste.
Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Request for Manual Refund
(1) A TAS Operations Assistance Request (OAR) may request authority to process a manual refund for a hardship case related to a return incorrectly moved to MFT 32. If it is determined that the return is still in the extended process of posting back to the MFT 30 when the refund should be released, TAS must be delegated with the authority to issue a manual refund. Permission for a manual refund should be issued, only when there is an unreversed TC 971 AC 052 present on MFT 30 with a "blank" MISC field or a TC 971 AC 052 with a MISC field of "RRPNONIDT", indicating that the income and/or wages require further verification by RIVO.
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
---|---|
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ | ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡"≡"≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ |
Review of Deleted Returns - UPC 147 RC 0 Only
(1) Referrals may be received requesting that a deleted UPC 147 RC 0 return be reprocessed. The requests should indicate that the taxpayer’s identity has been verified. Check AMS for remarks indicating that the taxpayer passed additional authentication.
Note: These procedures do not apply to UPC 147 RC 4 returns that were GUF auto-voided.
(2) Field assistance will fax Form 4442, Inquiry Referral, along with supporting documentation (e.g., return copy, supporting documents) when supplied with the information to a SP IDT function based on the Document Locator Number (DLN) of the deleted return.
DLN | SP IDT Campus | Fax Number | Mailing Address |
---|---|---|---|
A. 14, 16 | Andover (worked by Kansas City) | (877) 929-1586 | Internal Revenue Service, |
B. 80, 89, 90 | Fresno (worked by Kansas City) | (877) 929-1586 | Internal Revenue Service, |
C. 18, 75, 76 | Austin | (855) 252-2492 | Internal Revenue Service, |
D. 09, 70 | Kansas City | (877) 929-1586 | Internal Revenue Service, |
E. 29 | Ogden | (855) 226-1665 | Internal Revenue Service, |
F. 30, 32 | Philadelphia (worked by Ogden) | (855) 226-1665 | Internal Revenue Service, |
(3) Obtain a copy of the return if it was not provided with the referral.
If... | Then... |
---|---|
A. MeF return | Request print using Employee User Portal (EUP) if available. Note: In case of the MEF return being a part of "Reply" from the Taxpayer correspondence, please make sure if a TC 290 for .00 has been done in those circumstances. If a TC 290 for .00 is posted in the module for the appropriate tax year, then request for the paper DLN from Files. |
B. Paper return | Check whether a copy of the return is attached to the Form 4442. If not request from Files. If return is not available on first request, telephone taxpayer or send Letter 418C requesting copy of return and attachments. Note: Check whether return is available on Correspondence Imaging System. |
(4) Review the account of the deleted return following the research steps at IRM 3.28.4.4.4 , Research Steps. If research determines that the return was filed by the authorized SSN owner, then follow the steps as described below to have the return be reprocessed.
(5) Follow these steps to have the return processed:
Note: Process as a new return to allow assignment of a new document locator number (DLN).
Line through the DLN in red, if present.
Edit special processing code (SPC) “B” on the return.
Edit the correct received date from the original return that was deleted.
Edit "SPIDT" in the upper left-hand corner of the return. Do not write copy on the return and circle out "copy" or "duplicate" if present.
Enter history item/remarks, "SPIDT GOOD" on TXMOD.
Reverse any TC 971 AC 506 input for the tax period of the return. Input a TC 972 AC 506 with a MISC field of "WI SP IRSERR" per IRM 25.23.2-9, IMF Only TC 972 AC 506 Tax-Related, Reversal of Identity Theft Case Closure, IRS Identified.
Route to Batching for processing.