Rev. Proc. 83-19

Section 1. Purpose

The purpose of the Revenue Procedure is to restate and amplify the conditions under which a case closed after examination in the office of a District Director of Internal Revenue may be reopened to make an adjustment unfavorable to the taxpayer.

This procedure contains a listing of certain types of cases wherein reconsideration is not considered a reopening and makes clear that cases closed after examination by service centers require application of reopening procedures.

Sec. 2. Scope

This procedure pertains to all cases, regardless of type of tax, in which the prior audit and conference action, if any, did not extend beyond the jurisdiction of the office of the District Director. It does not apply to cases previously closed after consideration by Appeals Offices or District Counsels.

Sec. 3. Definitions

.01 Closed Case:

1. A case agreed at the district level is considered closed when the taxpayer is notified in writing, after district conference, if any, of adjustments to tax liability or acceptance of the taxpayer's return without change.

2. An unagreed income, estate or gift tax case is considered closed when the period for filing a petition with the United States Tax Court specified in the statutory notice of deficiency issued by the District Director expires and no petition was filed.

3. An unagreed excise or employment tax case is considered closed when the period for filing protest and requesting consideration by the Appeals Office specified in the preliminary letter expires and no protest or request for Appeals consideration is filed.

.02 Examinations and Reopening:

1. Contacts with taxpayers to correct mathematical errors are not examinations or reopenings.

2. Contacts with a taxpayer to verify or adjust a discrepancy between the taxpayer's tax return and information returns, including late or amended information returns, are not examinations or reopenings. For this purpose, information returns include returns and amended returns filed by partnerships, fiduciaries and small business corporations.

3. A contact to verify a discrepancy disclosed by an information return matching program may include inspection of the taxpayer's books of account, to the extent necessary to resolve the discrepancy, without being considered an inspection within the meaning of section 7605(b) of the Code. A contact to verify an item of income shown on an information return to a tax return is not a verification of a discrepancy where such item of income is not required to be shown as a specific line item on a tax return. For example, insurance companies making payments to a doctor of $600 or more during a calendar year must furnish the doctor a Form 1099-MED. The doctor is only required to include that income with other gross receipts on Schedule C, Form 1040. If the doctor reported gross receipts of a larger amount than the total amount of income shown on Forms 1099-MED, there would not be a discrepancy between the information returns and the income tax return.

4. The adjustment of an unallowable item, or an adjustment resulting from other types of service center correction programs, is not considered to be an examination. Therefore, a subsequent examination does not constitute a reopening of a case closed after examination.

5. Reconsideration of a case is not considered a reopening and therefore, requires no approval or issuance of form letter (DO/IO/SC) if it involves:

(a) Cases involving section 1311 of the Code.

(b) Cases involving the year of deduction of a net operating loss carryback or similar type of carryback under other provisions of the Code.

(c) Cases in which there have been involuntary conversions and the taxpayer has not recomputed his/her tax liability because he/she did not replace the property within the time provided by section 1033 of the Code.

(d) Cases involving an overpayment in excess of $200,000, subject to consideration by the Joint Committee on Taxation under section 6405 of the Code.

Sec. 4. Policy

.01 The Internal Revenue Service will not reopen any case closed after examination by a district office or service center to make an adjustment unfavorable to the taxpayer unless:

1. There is evidence of fraud, malfeasance, collusion, concealment or misrepresentation of a material fact; or

2. The prior closing involved a clearly defined substantial error based on an established Service position existing at the time of the previous examination; or

3. Other circumstances exist that indicate failure to reopen would be a serious administrative omission.

.02 All reopenings must be approved by the Chief, Examination Division (District Director in Streamlined Districts), or Chief, Compliance Division, for cases under his/her jurisdiction. If an additional inspection of the taxpayer's books of account is necessary, the notice to the taxpayer required by section 7605(b) of the Code must be signed by the Chief, Examination Division (District Director in Streamlined Districts), or Chief, Compliance Division, for cases under his/her jurisdiction.

Sec. 5. Effect on Other Documents

This Revenue Procedure supersedes Rev. Proc. 81-35, 1981-2 C.B. 588.