Tax Notes logo

SERVICE ADDS PREPAID TUITION PLANS TO NO-RULE LIST.

JUN. 11, 1996

Rev. Proc. 96-34; 1996-1 C.B. 721

DATED JUN. 11, 1996
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    Internal Revenue Service
  • Cross-Reference

    For prior coverage, see Tax Notes, Sept. 4, 1995, p. 1151; or see 95

    TNT 171-3. Also see Tax Notes, Dec. 12, 1994, p. 1317.

    State of Michigan, et al. v. United States, 802 F.Supp. 120, 92 TNT

    173-17 (W.D. Mich. 1992), rev'd 40 F.3d 817, 94 TNT 221-4 (6th Cir.

    1994)

    Communications Division

    PART III

    Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous

    26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters

    (Also Part I, sections 61, 115, 163, 1275, 2501, 7701; 1.61-7, 1.163-

    7, 1.1275-4, 25.2501-1, 301.7701-2)

  • Code Sections
  • Subject Areas/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    state and municipal income
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 96-17217 (2 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    96 TNT 115-14
Citations: Rev. Proc. 96-34; 1996-1 C.B. 721

Superseded by Rev. Proc. 97-3

Rev. Proc. 96-34

SECTION 1. PURPOSE

This revenue procedure amplifies Rev. Proc. 96-3, 1996-1 I.R.B. 82, which sets forth areas of the Internal Revenue Code under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Domestic) in which the Internal Revenue Service will not issue advance rulings or determination letters.

SECTION 2. BACKGROUND

Rev. Proc 96-3, section 5, lists specific areas in which rulings or determination letters will not be issued because the areas are under extensive study. This revenue procedure adds a subparagraph for state-created prepaid tuition plans.

SECTION 3. PROCEDURE

Rev. Proc. 96-3 is amplified by adding to section 5 the following: Section 115.--Income of states, municipalities, etc. -- The results of transactions pursuant to a plan or arrangement created by state statute a primary objective of which is to enable participants to pay for the costs of a post-secondary education for themselves or a designated beneficiary, including: (i) whether the plan or arrangement, itself, is an entity separate from a state and, if so, how the plan or arrangement is treated for federal tax purposes; and (ii) whether any contract under the plan or arrangement is a debt instrument and, if so, how interest or original issue discount attributable to the contract is treated for federal tax purposes. (Also sections 61, 163, 1275, 2501 and 7701)

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE

This revenue procedure applies to all ruling requests, including any pending in the National Office on June 11, 1996.

SECTION 5. EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE PROCEDURES

Rev. Proc. 96-3 is amplified.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this revenue procedure is Craig Wojay of the Office of Assistant Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact Mr. Wojay at (202) 622-3920 (not a toll-free number).

DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Institutional Authors
    Internal Revenue Service
  • Cross-Reference

    For prior coverage, see Tax Notes, Sept. 4, 1995, p. 1151; or see 95

    TNT 171-3. Also see Tax Notes, Dec. 12, 1994, p. 1317.

    State of Michigan, et al. v. United States, 802 F.Supp. 120, 92 TNT

    173-17 (W.D. Mich. 1992), rev'd 40 F.3d 817, 94 TNT 221-4 (6th Cir.

    1994)

    Communications Division

    PART III

    Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous

    26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters

    (Also Part I, sections 61, 115, 163, 1275, 2501, 7701; 1.61-7, 1.163-

    7, 1.1275-4, 25.2501-1, 301.7701-2)

  • Code Sections
  • Subject Areas/Tax Topics
  • Index Terms
    state and municipal income
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 96-17217 (2 original pages)
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    96 TNT 115-14
Copy RID