Tax Notes logo

Ninth Circuit Affirms Imposition of Frivolous Argument Penalty

OCT. 5, 2016

Waltner, Steven T. v. Comm.

DATED OCT. 5, 2016
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    STEVEN T. WALTNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 14-71531
  • Judge
    Per curiam
  • Cross-Reference
    Affirming Waltner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2014-35 (2014).
  • Parallel Citation
    659 Fed. Appx. 440
    2016-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,430
    118 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6031
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Areas/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2016-20203
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2016 TNT 194-10

Waltner, Steven T. v. Comm.

 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

 

 

Tax Ct. No. 21953-12L

 

 

MEMORANDUM*

 

 

Appeal from a Decision of the

 

United States Tax Court

 

 

Submitted September 27, 2016**

 

 

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Steven T. Waltner appeals from the Tax Court's order imposing a penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion, Wolf v. Comm'r, 4 F.3d 709, 716 (9th Cir. 1993), and we affirm.

The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a $2,500 penalty on Waltner for taking frivolous positions after warning Waltner that such conduct could lead to sanctions. See 26 U.S.C. § 6673(a)(1) (authorizing penalty not to exceed $25,000 for maintaining a position that is frivolous or groundless in a Tax Court proceeding); Wolf, 4 F.3d at 716 ("When taxpayers are on notice that they may face sanctions for frivolous litigation, the tax court is within its discretion to award sanctions under section 6673.").

We reject as without merit Waltner's contention that the Tax Court lacked jurisdiction to impose sanctions because Waltner did not point to any authority that supports his contention, and reject as unsupported by the record Waltner's contention that the Tax Court violated his due process rights by imposing sanctions.

AFFIRMED.

 

FOOTNOTES

 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 

END OF FOOTNOTES
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES
  • Case Name
    STEVEN T. WALTNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
  • Court
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • Docket
    No. 14-71531
  • Judge
    Per curiam
  • Cross-Reference
    Affirming Waltner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2014-35 (2014).
  • Parallel Citation
    659 Fed. Appx. 440
    2016-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,430
    118 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6031
  • Code Sections
  • Subject Areas/Tax Topics
  • Jurisdictions
  • Language
    English
  • Tax Analysts Document Number
    Doc 2016-20203
  • Tax Analysts Electronic Citation
    2016 TNT 194-10
Copy RID