IRS Announces OID Inflation-Adjusted Dollar Amounts for 2017
Rev. Rul. 2016-30; 2016-52 I.R.B 876
- Institutional AuthorsInternal Revenue Service
- Cross-Reference
- Code Sections
- Subject Areas/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2016-24859
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2016 TNT 247-8
Supplemented and Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2018-11; Supersedes and Supplements Rev. Rul. 2015-24
BACKGROUND
In general, §§ 483 and 1274 determine the principal amount of a debt instrument given in consideration for the sale or exchange of nonpublicly traded property. In addition, any interest on a debt instrument subject to § 1274 is taken into account under the original issue discount provisions of the Code. Section 1274A, however, modifies the rules under §§ 483 and 1274 for certain types of debt instruments.
In the case of a "qualified debt instrument," the discount rate used for purposes of §§ 483 and 1274 may not exceed nine percent, compounded semiannually. Section 1274A(b) defines a qualified debt instrument as any debt instrument given in consideration for the sale or exchange of property (other than new § 38 property within the meaning of § 48(b), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990) if the stated principal amount of the instrument does not exceed the amount specified in § 1274A(b). For debt instruments arising out of sales or exchanges before January 1, 1990, this amount is $2,800,000.
In the case of a "cash method debt instrument," as defined in § 1274A(c), the borrower and lender may elect to use the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting. In particular, for any cash method debt instrument, § 1274 does not apply, and interest on the instrument is accounted for by both the borrower and the lender under the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting. A cash method debt instrument is a qualified debt instrument that meets the following additional requirements: (A) in the case of a debt instrument arising out of a sale or exchange before January 1, 1990, the stated principal amount does not exceed $2,000,000; (B) the lender does not use an accrual method of accounting and is not a dealer with respect to the property sold or exchanged; (C) § 1274 would have applied to the debt instrument but for an election under § 1274A(c); and (D) an election under § 1274A(c) is jointly made with respect to the debt instrument by the borrower and the lender. Section 1.1274A-1(c)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides rules concerning the time for, and manner of, making this election.
Section 1274A(d)(2) provides that, for any debt instrument arising out of a sale or exchange during any calendar year after 1989, the dollar amounts stated in § 1274A(b) and § 1274A(c)(2)(A) are increased by the inflation adjustment for the calendar year. Any increase due to the inflation adjustment is rounded to the nearest multiple of $100 (or, if the increase is a multiple of $50 and not of $100, the increase is increased to the nearest multiple of $100). The inflation adjustment for any calendar year is the percentage (if any) by which the CPI for the preceding calendar year exceeds the CPI for calendar year 1988. Section 1274A(d)(2)(B) defines the CPI for any calendar year as the average of the Consumer Price Index as of the close of the 12-month period ending on September 30 of that calendar year.
INFLATION-ADJUSTED AMOUNTS UNDER § 1274A
For debt instruments arising out of sales or exchanges after December 31, 1989, the inflation-adjusted amounts under § 1274A are shown in Table 1.
Rev. Rul. 2016-30 Table 1
Inflation-Adjusted Amounts Under Section 1274A
______________________________________________________________________
1274A(c)(2)(A) Amount
Calendar Year of 1274A(b) Amount (cash method
Sale or Exchange (qualified debt instrument) debt instrument)
______________________________________________________________________
1990 $2,933,200 $2,095,100
1991 $3,079,600 $2,199,700
1992 $3,234,900 $2,310,600
1993 $3,332,400 $2,380,300
1994 $3,433,500 $2,452,500
1995 $3,523,600 $2,516,900
1996 $3,622,500 $2,587,500
1997 $3,723,800 $2,659,900
1998 $3,823,100 $2,730,800
1999 $3,855,500 $2,775,400
2000 $3,960,100 $2,828,700
2001 $4,085,900 $2,918,500
2002 $4,217,500 $3,012,500
2003 $4,280,800 $3,057,700
2004 $4,381,300 $3,129,500
2005 $4,381,300 $3,202,100
2006 $4,483,000 $3,307,400
2007 $4,800,800 $3,429,100
2008 $4,913,400 $3,509,600
2009 $5,131,700 $3,665,500
2010 $5,115,100 $3,653,600
2011 $5,201,300 $3,715,200
2012 $5,339,300 $3,813,800
2013 $5,468,200 $3,905,900
2014 $5,557,200 $3,969,500
2015 $5,647,300 $4,033,800
2016 $5,664,800 $4,046,300
2017 $5,717,400 $4,083,800
______________________________________________________________________
Note: These inflation adjustments were computed using the
All-Urban, Consumer Price Index, 1982-1984 base, published by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Rev. Rul. 2015-24, 2015-48 I.R.B. 687, is supplemented and superseded.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The author of this revenue ruling is Bernard Audet of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Bernard Audet at (202) 317-7053 (not a toll-free number).
- Institutional AuthorsInternal Revenue Service
- Cross-Reference
- Code Sections
- Subject Areas/Tax Topics
- Jurisdictions
- LanguageEnglish
- Tax Analysts Document NumberDoc 2016-24859
- Tax Analysts Electronic Citation2016 TNT 247-8